ORN-O Day of Action Against the Olympics
May 12, 2009. – With 9 months to go before the Vancouver Olympics, local anti-Olympic activists are stepping up their activities and taking on one of the biggest Olympic sponsors: Royal Bank of Canada.

Members and supporters of AW@L and KW Anti-Racist Action held a rally in front of the main Waterloo branch of the RBC at 74 King St. South. The protest began at noon and continued until around to 2pm.

The Royal Bank of Canada (RBC) is a primary sponsor of the 2010 Winter Olympics. Activists say the Olympics are resulting in human rights abuses and environmental destruction. Homelessness in Vancouver is skyrocketing due to soaring property values and redevelopment of low-income apartments into condominiums and hotels. More than 12,000 police and military are to be deployed for the Games at a cost of more than 1 billion dollars. Groups such as the BC Civil Liberties Association have raised concerns that free speech will be suppressed and an “Olympic legacy” of surveillance cameras will remain. Grassroots movements in indigenous communities and environmentalists are saying no to the Olympics. They see the land being irreparably damaged by expanding Olympic development.

The protestors call on the RBC to withdraw support for the Vancouver Olympics. Until such a time, people will be asked to take their banking business elsewhere.

- aw@l's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page

Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Reddit
Facebook
Google
Yahoo


In the early 1950s, the
In the early 1950s, the DuMont internet phone service Television Network began the modern trend of selling advertisement time to multiple sponsors. Previously, DuMont had trouble finding sponsors for many of their programs and compensated by selling smaller merchant account blocks of advertising time to several businesses. This eventually became the standard for the commercial television industry in the United States. However, it was still a common practice to have single sponsor high speed internet service shows, such as The United States Steel Hour. In some instances the sponsors exercised great control over the content of the show - up to and including having one's advertising agency actually writing the show. The single sponsor model is much hard drive recovery less prevalent now, a notable exception being the Hallmark Hall of Fame.
Futile without Force & Therefore Forgettable
I understand that AW@L is anti war. I do understand the hardships of the people of Vancouver having to deal with instant and temporary inflation. Truth is, Vancouver, along with other cities, hope to win an Olympic bid, to make a fast dollar. The only way stop this from happening every 2 years is to push for a central site, which will get the Olympics every year. One for winter, One for summer. I suggest Switzerland for winter games for obvious reasons, and Athens for Summer Games(they should get it, right?). There could be a permanent Olympic village, a community of experts to run the facility, and a year round practice facility for athletes. Now that there is no cold war, I think the public cares less and less about the Olympics, and personally I could care less who is the better skier or swimmer. Canada still has the best potential as a country regardless how many medals we win at the games.
The only way to stop this Capitalist rat race is to take the money from the hands of the greedy pigs who impose there will for more profits, worldwide. Good luck unless you intend on using force. Even the first inkling of 5th generation society behavior, (The Olympics), has become a beacon of economic tyranny. To become a global community with a common goal, you need to take selfish ambition out of the equation.
The only practical solution to every problem like this is to find a way for them to still make money that we agree with. Unfortunately,they don't have to listen.
Shane from St. Kitts.
-A comment without feedback is simply an unjustified Rant.
protesting
I think it is a great thing when people stand for a change and choose to want a better world to live in. I also think it is great when people find a CONSTRUCTIVE & PRODUCTIVE way to make change
It is however, shameful when people take matters into their own hands and "blindly follow" a leader who riles up his minions to do his bidding - leading off the fodder to fall while the leader takes the least risk.
It is great to want to make a better world - take a close look at yourself and everyone else around you before you condemn strangers - my professor once said "don't take my word for it, go find out for yourself"
So I ask, where will you be in 5 years?? Who will you work for? What will you be linked to for all the world to judge? Are you here to make a difference or just complain about injustice? We can always find injustice in our world and being obnoxious doesn't always fix it.
Or will you just blindly follow the leader??
Go Hitler!!!
i think it is a great thing
i think it is a great thing when people critically and respectfully engage with those whose tactics for social change they disagree with. i also think it is great when people find something intelligent and useful to say.
it is however, shameful when people make reference to Hitler when they are taking about anything that doesn't directly concern WW2-comparing things to Nazism is irresponsible and ignorant.
It is a great thing to have an analysis of other people's actions, but it is more useful when that analysis is coherent and clear.
So I ask, why is it that who one will "work for" in the future is the proper measure of today's actions? What kind of difference can we make if addressing injustice and oppression are not our first steps? and why are people who use the internet to criticise protesting always so obnoxious?
Go anonymous comments!
PEACE
-alex.